| Editor's Note: Issue 7 |
|
|
|
|
Okay. Before I begin, I feel compelled to tell you dear readers, that I am currently completing my master’s thesis project, which sets out to map the genre of the editor’s note. As you can imagine, it seems a little awkard writing this note in the midst of researching the very same subject. Not to mention my post-structuralist fears of writing a thin and oversimplified analysis or of abusing the privilege I have of introducing you to the wonderful work within. I begged Amy to make the introductions this time, but she kindly assured me it was my turn. So I waited (procastinated). And in the meantime, I continued my research. To my relief, I soon stumbled upon an important realization—in many cases the editor’s note closely resembles the voice, form, and function of the essay. What does this mean? Montaigne, the father of the genre, used this word essay (meaning “to try” or “to attempt”) because he felt this “trying” was a key characteristic of the form. I love this invitation to essay the essay. I love that the act of attempting, in and of itself, is worthwhile. That said, I am excited to share the observations I have gathered after hours upon hours of lovingly seeing the magazine through to publication, pouring over lines of a poem or the phrasing of a story in inexplicably detailed (and often hair-splitting) ways. I have decided that I have just enough standing to tell you my thoughts, so long as I don’t simplify what isn’t simple and don’t forget the freedom in my new favorite verb, essay.
Well, let me try and answer. For our contributors, addiction has many stories and many threads. Sometimes it is about the circular and the “Stalled” as Amanda McQuade calls it; sometimes it is about the profound places where the circular becomes a vehicle for movement and growth. Yes, it is both. And yes, addiction has many other “sometimes.”
One of our readers recently shared that, for her, the word ruminate had a negative connotation suggesting obsessive and cyclical
thinking that rendered one incapable of action. I am grateful that
this is not the experience or connotation for most of our readers, and
yet, I find it fascinating that this idea of returning or circling back
can be a negative movement, just as much as it can be a positive one.
In her poem “Making Merit,” Elizabeth Carlson writes about this
ambiguity: Released, I knew the birds were trained to return—
As much as addiction can define what is compulsive and therefore unhealthy, there are other stories where the returning is restorative, where it is a sign of consistency, or, as is the case
with the prodigal son, a lowering of one’s self before Him who
deserves every return. Perhaps what can be distinguished between our
two connotations of circling is the thing to which we are
returning—our “stalled” selves, or a grace utterly outside of us
The pinwheel shapes in the work of our innovative featured artist,
Deanne Moulten, speaks to this circular motion’s capability for growth,
as does Laura Solomon’s closing line in “The Cartographer’s Trauma Upon
Waking.” Solomon writes, “Like all who map new territories, / I begin
again and again.” You can imagine my surprise to also read staffer
Alexa Behmer’s comment in our “Last Note” section, a quote from St.
Benedictine: “Always we begin again.” As all three of these instances
suggest with their visions of beginnings and innovations, we are not
defined by our addictions and the circle is not immutable. Mercies are
new every morning.
Brianna VanDyke |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|


